browsing Entertainment

The Dark Knight

Posted on Friday 25 July 2008

I really wanted to post commentary on this before now, as it’s been a week since I actually saw the movie, but I’ve been quite busy.

This is all about meeting and exceeding expectations. If I had any criticism to make of the movie, it would be that there was no preamble to what will follow in this latest Batman series. But even that may just be a good thing.

Heath Ledger gets a pardon for that shameful film I like to refer to as “The Miserable Failure” (i.e. Brokeback Mountain) in what will likely come to be known as his final cinematic moments (my understanding is that there is a film called The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus that is currently in post-production, however, it would take a lot to overshadow his role in this film). Without being a spoiler for those who haven’t seen it, this Joker is a far darker and more sinister character that is much more true to himself. The jokes are not implemented through grand motions and vocal intonations, but are delivered dry and to the point. One would think that this would soften the blow of the comedic delivery, however, the jokes have more depth and more humor than even Nicholson’s Joker. The local dime-store make-up job only enhances this home-grown character who has about as many reasons for his facial deformities as there are costumes in a Madonna concert.

The Batman character continues where we left him in Batman Begins. A dark and wealthy man who is a lackadaisical billionaire by day and a deeply complex superhero by night. Again, we are given the deep, overly synthesized voice that became the voice of Batman in Begins, however, it continues to be true and relevant to the story as a method to further mask the identity of a superhero the citizens love to hate.

The development of Two-Face, asĀ  a minor sub-plot, is delivered impeccably. Though the character has very little time to develop, he remains central to the story and does not deviate from the core values that make the character until he is greeted with a major life-altering event. At this point, the transformation is delivered with intent and purpose.

Despite these major players in the film, I can not express enough how much I enjoy watching Gary Oldman work. Even after seeing the first film and having difficulty believing that he is indeed playing the part of Lt. Gordon, I still marvel at the diversity of this man’s abilities. Though not nearly as central to the plot and the story as the rest, the character is everything that it needs to be and does not deviate from the character’s true identity.

Last, this movie is all about delivering a believable and real Batman. With a couple of minor exceptions, the techno toys this Batman is given to play with are the brainchild of his own corporate empire and, though not entirely within the realm of our current technological capabilities, are certainly more than believable in this almost realistic Gotham City.

Much criticism has been written about the levels of violence and a couple of relatively graphic scenes that make the film’s PG-13 rating somewhat questionable. Personally, I didn’t see it. This movie had very little in the way of violence that was at all a departure from what one sees in any of the latest action films. The so-called graphic scenes are little more than cinematographic and cg trickery. Though I would recommend a parent see this film prior to taking the children, I personally believe any criticism of this film as gory or at all graphic is simply a perpetuation of the wussification of America.

At the end of the day, I can not say this is the best movie I have ever seen, nor can I say that it is even better than Batman Begins. The two story-lines are wholly different in their purpose and in their implementation. I can, however, say that I think this movie should easily be a nominee for several major awards (including the Oscar for Best Picture). I would recommend that any fan of the Batman comics and the Batman character make it a point to see this film sooner, rather than later.

A Family Guy that made even me cringe

Posted on Sunday 27 January 2008

I consider myself to be relatively immune to taking offense to anything. In many ways, I find myself amused by things that many people would gasp over. I’m good in that place.

But I swear on the life of my mother, I have never felt more morally deprived and somewhat dirty on the inside than I did laughing hysterically at tonight’s episode of Family Guy (Peter’s Daughter). Are you kidding me? This episode went from one morally reprehensible scene to another.

What gets me is that this show is on Fox. Sister network to Fox news. The most right-wing Republican news network. How does this happen? And how is it that I feel such a stinging pain on the inside to be sitting here laughing at this stuff and knowing that it’s just WRONG!!! WRONG, I tell you.

Is it just me? If anyone else watched this episode, tell me I’m not alone……

The Misfits

Posted on Saturday 24 November 2007

on a whim (and a tip), i made my way down to st. pete last night to see the misfits at state theater. i went into this thing without much in the way of expectations- you know, that whole retirement age, washed up band factor that can really kill a show with a lack of energy and a general “i just need to pay the bills” mentality. this was so not the case last night.

i was highly impressed with these guys. they were high energy and when they seemed to be experiencing technical difficulty, it was seamless, unless you were really paying attention. the stage set was pretty awesome, the venue (which, surprisingly, i had never been to before) was nice and the crowd was alive. if it weren’t for the two kids slobbering all over each other, nudging me out of the way and basically trying to screw each other all over ME, it would have been perfect. that’s my only complaint really and it was minor. of course, i was sitting there laughing at the kid, because he couldn’t figure out that with the lighting in the venue, he needed to disable his flash to get a good picture. if they hadn’t been a couple of raging assholes, i likely would have done the nice thing and fixed it for him. so i’m standing there over his shoulder watching him take washed out picture after washed out picture. i just laughed at him (i guess i am kind of an asshole, huh?).

seriously, though, i was watching the pit area and, even though it was full of young twenty-somethings, they seemed to be doing it the way we used to do it before pits became slugfests……..more about chaos and violence without intent, rather than an excuse to beat someone senseless. i liked that aspect of it too, though grandpa still stays away from those things these days (i’d much rather enjoy the show). besides, you’ll never top the pit we had going for ministry at lollapalooza 2 (1992). that thing was massive and FUN. we were chucking water bottles at each other and sliding around in the mud. for those who don’t know the background, the show in orlando that year happened the same day andrew rolled through south florida, so there was outer banding happening overhead and the place was a mudbath. but that’s a tangent……

i did get a good chuckle at the kid who appeared to be 19 at best wearing the g.g. allin sweatshirt. i’m thinking to myself, this kid was in elementary school when g.g. allin DIED (and, of course, somehow didn’t manage to fulfill his prophetic ideal of blowing himself up).

the one thing the band did that kind of threw me off for a minute……he gets on the mic and starts talking about how this is “for the kids”…….looking around, there were probably 5 or 6 kids in the range of 12-15 in the place. i mean, don’t get me wrong…..it’s kinda cool to see the kids enjoying a band that people were enjoying before i was even their age, but THAT show is NOT for the kids. not implying any morality here. this is merely to say that i, at the age of 35, enjoyed that show. and i, at the age of 35, payed money to see that show. that show was for me as much as for them. but, i know, it’s cool and commendable to make it all about “the kids”. great. they are the future, but WE are the present. my take. but what do i know?

summary: a GREAT show with a couple of minor blemishes that didn’t really distract from it. if you guys are out there in another town and this hasn’t come through yet, go. it was a rather steep price to pay…..$25 at the door……but it was worth it. WELL worth it.

blog.grahamallen.net designed by SEO-Themes and powered by Wordpress